Diving into Scopus-Indexed Journals: Navigating Qualitative Accounting Research Trends and Methodologies
- Mohammed Muneerali Thottoli
- muneerali@controlling.rwth-aachen.de
- Chair of Management Accounting, School of Business and Economics, RWTH Aachen University, Templergraben, Aachen, Germany
- (Corresponding Author)
- Essia Ries Ahmed
- essiaaburies@karabuk.edu.tr
- Associate Professor Karabuk University, Karabuk, Turkey.
Submitted
November 22, 2023
Accepted
November 22, 2023
Accepted
November 22, 2023
- Received
- 23rd March 2025
- Revised
- 4th June 2025
- Accepted
- 16th June 2025
Abstract
This study reviews the topics and methods commonly employed in qualitative accounting
research published in Scopus-indexed journals. We conducted a systematic literature review with
bibliometric analysis, examining 149 articles from these journals. The study includes both articles and
review papers relevant to qualitative research in business, management, and accounting, all published in
English. Although the Bibliometrix tool can import data from other databases like Web of Science and
PubMed, we chose to focus solely on Scopus to ensure consistency in metadata formatting and because of
its relevance to our study’s scope. Our findings reveal that management accounting, auditing, and
various other areas represent a significant portion of the topics and research methods in qualitative
accounting research. The qualitative approaches identified often integrate researchers’ field impressions
with social theories, including practice theory and decision-usefulness frameworks, as well as
methodological tools such as literature analysis, meta-synthesis, and structured literature reviews. This
study contributes to the ongoing discussion about specific methods that can encourage researchers to
explore diverse topics in qualitative accounting research. As one of the pioneering reviews in this area, it
provides a solid foundation for researchers looking to navigate this domain.
Keywords
Systematic review
qualitative methods
qualitative accounting research
Scopus
bibliometric analysis
This work is licensed under LJB.
- Citation
Thottoli, M. M., & Ahmed, E. R. (2025). Diving into Scopus-Indexed Journals: Navigating Qualitative Accounting Research Trends and Methodologies. The Lahore Journal of Business, 12(2), 57-82.
- References
- Agrifoglio, R., & de Gennaro, D. (2022). New ways of working through emerging technologies: a meta-synthesis of the adoption of blockchain in the accountancy domain. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 17(2), 836-850.
- Ahmed, A. H., Mardini, G. H., Burton, B. M., & Dunne, T. M. (2018). Is internet reporting useful? Evidence from Egypt. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 19(4), 574-591.
- Ahrens, T. (2022). Paper development in qualitative accounting research: bringing social contexts to life. Qualitative Research in Accounting and Management, 19(1), 1-17.
- Ahrens, T. (2022b). Tacit coordination as a background practice to accounting practices: Reflections on Vollmer’s case for a sociological super-theory of accounting. Qualitative Research in Accounting and Management, 21(3), 261- 269.
- Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959-975.
- Atkins, J. F., Solomon, A., Norton, S., & Joseph, N. L. (2015). The emergence of integrated private reporting. Meditari Accountancy Research, 23(1), 28-61.
- Azzari, V., Mainardes, E. W., & Costa, F. M. D. (2021). Accounting services quality: a systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis. Asian Journal of Accounting Research, 6(1), 80-94.
- Baard, V. C., & Dumay, J. (2020). Interventionist research in accounting: reflections on the good, the bad and the ugly. Accounting and Finance, 60(3), 1979-2006.
- Bailey, L. F. (2014). The origin and success of qualitative research. International Journal of Market Research, 56(2), 167-184.
- Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. K. (1997). Qualitative research for education (Vol. 368). Allyn & Bacon.
- Bradford, S. C. (1985). Sources of information on specific subjects. Journal of Information Science, 10(4), 173-180.
- Broadbent, J. (2012). Commentary on Parker: Groundhog Day and optimism. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 23(1), 71-77.
- Broadbent, J. (2016). A gender agenda. Meditari Accountancy Research, 24(2), 169- 181.
- Burton, F. G., Summers, S. L., Wilks, T. J., & Wood, D. A. (2022). Relevance of accounting research (ROAR) scores: Ratings of titles and abstracts by accounting professionals. Accounting Horizons, 36(2), 7-18.
- Busetto, L., Wick, W., & Gumbinger, C. (2020). How to use and assess qualitative research methods. Neurological Research and Practice, 2(1), 14.
- Clark, J. A., & Cavatorta, F. (Eds.). (2018). Political science research in the Middle East and North Africa: Methodological and ethical challenges. Oxford University Press.
- De Loo, I., & Lowe, A. (2017). ‘[T] here are known knowns… things we know that we know’: Some reflections on the nature and practice of interpretive accounting research. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 30(8), 1796-1819.
- de Villiers, C., Dumay, J., & Maroun, W. (2019). Qualitative accounting research: dispelling myths and developing a new research agenda. Accounting and Finance, 59(3), 1459-1487.
- Goddard, A. (2010). Contemporary public sector accounting research–An international comparison of journal papers. The British Accounting Review, 42(2), 75-87.
- Haynes, K. (2006). A therapeutic journey? Reflections on the effects of research on researcher and participants. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 1(3), 204-221.