The Statement of Ethics, Policies and Responsibilities
The Lahore Journal of Business (LJB) adheres to a strict code of conduct to be followed by all the parties associated with the publication process: the authors, the editors, the editorial board, the peer reviewers, the publisher and the readers. This Code of Conduct is derived from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines, which can be found at www.publicationethics.org. The principal responsibilities lie with the editors, the authors and the reviewers.
Editorial Governance and Independence
LJB operates under a transparent editorial structure. The editorial board is composed of subject experts, whose names, institutional affiliations, and contact information are publicly accessible. The board exercises complete editorial freedom and makes decisions solely based on academic merit and ethical considerations. The publisher or the sponsoring institution exercises no influence on editorial content or decision making.
Authorship and Contributorship
Article authorship should be determined by significant input to the study conception, design, execution or interpretation. The CRediT taxonomy is used in LJB so that each author can be defined in the contribution. The writers need to be careful to cite and/or quote any other works, words, and/or ideas of others. These involve self-references by the author(s) to their own work, which had already been published before their present work. Every author should agree with the final form of the manuscript. Any request to have authors added, removed, or rearranged after submission is forwarded to ljb@lahoreschool.edu.pk and includes a written statement with all authors’ signatures, including the one being added or removed. Authorship change requests need to be reasonable, accepted by the other co-authors, and approved by the editor. In the event of any dispute over authorship, the journal shall abide by COPE principles, and the authors’ institutions may be asked to investigate the issue.
Plagiarism and Originality
The Lahore Journal of Business adheres to the Higher Education Commission (HEC) ‘s plagiarism policies. The author(s) must ensure that the papers, manuscripts, and articles that are submitted to the Lahore Journal of Business are entirely original works. Any original research submitted must present an accurate description and an objective discussion of the significance of the work undertaken. Any of the underlying data or facts used should be accurately and completely represented in the manuscript. If the author(s) have used any work, words or and/or ideas from any other sources, the authors must ensure that this work has been appropriately cited and/or quoted. Any plagiarism, including self-plagiarism or “text recycling”, will be grounds for the retraction or rejection of articles or manuscripts. Any type of plagiarism is undesirable and should be avoided as unethical publication conduct.
Subscription Policy
The annual subscription charges are PKR 600 for domestic subscribers and US $50 for overseas subscribers. If you wish to subscribe, please email the LJB at ljb@lahoreschool.edu.pk for a subscription form.
Article Processing Charges
https://mc04.manuscriptcentral.com/ljb.
Advertisement Policy
Archiving Policy
The Lahore Journal of Business ensures the long-term preservation and accessibility of published articles by archiving them on secure platforms, including the Public Knowledge Project Preservation Network (PKP PN) and the National Digital Archive of Pakistan Scientific and Technological Information Centre, and assigning each article a Digital Object Identifier (DOI). It has established a distributed archiving framework across participating libraries and journals to maintain permanent archives of the original, authentic versions of the content. Furthermore, the publisher (Lahore School of Economics) maintains an in-house archival system (DSpace) that archives all full-text articles of the journal. This platform integrates with long-term digital preservation systems to ensure all articles remain accessible over time. The collaborative nature of our archiving policy underscores the commitment to preserving scholarly work for future generations of researchers and readers.
Repository Policy
Conflicts of Interest
Conflicts of interest may be financial, such as funding, employment, or share ownership, or non-financial, such as personal relationships, academic competition, or institutional affiliations. Authors are required to declare all conflicts of interest at the time of submission, and every published article must include a statement either disclosing conflicts or declaring that none exist. Any potential conflict of interest or the perception of bias in favour of or against the potential authors must be made clear to other members of the editorial board, and the relevant member of the editorial staff must refrain from handling the relevant manuscript(s). Reviewers must also declare any potential conflicts and decline invitations if appropriate. The reviewers ought not to consider manuscripts for which they have competing, cooperative, or other relationships or affiliations with any of the authors, businesses, or organisations associated with the manuscripts that could give rise to a conflict of interest. Potential conflicts of interest, or the possibility of the perception of bias in favour of or against potential authors, must be made clear to other members of the editorial board, and the relevant member of the editorial staff must refrain from handling the relevant manuscript(s). The journal will record COI declarations, publish relevant COI statements with articles, and, where a serious undeclared COI is discovered post publication, will follow the journal’s investigation and correction/retraction procedures. The journal keeps COI records for at least five years.
Research Ethics
LJB requires that research involving human participants be conducted in compliance with established ethical standards. To secure institutional ethics approval, authors must confirm that participants gave informed consent. They must also obtain informed consent, keep confidential information confidential, and manage all data in a responsible manner, fully adhering to relevant ethical standards and laws. Manuscripts are asked to include information about ethical considerations, approvals and informed consent. In research involving animals, authors must demonstrate adherence to international welfare standards. The journal stresses honesty, integrity, and respect for research subjects in all published work.
Data Availability and Reproducibility
Allegations of Misconduct
Corrections, Retractions, and Expressions of Concern
LJB believes that academic integrity in the record must be maintained. Where mistakes are found that may have compromised the quality of published work, a correction will be issued by the journal. A retraction will be made in instances of known misconduct or invalid results. An expression of concern can be made where an investigation is pending. All such notices will be associated with the original article. Articles that are retracted will be watermarked and placed in the journal archive. The journal strives to inform CrossRef/DOI providers and indexing services (such as DOAJ) of corrections and retractions to update metadata and records. The journal tends to publish corrections within 30 days of verification, and retractions as soon as practicable after an investigation has been completed.
Professional Conduct and Harassment Policy
LJB has a zero-tolerance policy of harassment, discrimination, or academic bullying. Professional and respectful behaviour is expected from all stakeholders involved in the publication process, including authors, reviewers, and editors. Complaints will be taken seriously and discreetly. Unprofessional or harassing behaviour should be reported confidentially to ljb@lahoreschool.edu.pk and will be addressed promptly.
Funding Policy
Responsibilities of the Editors
- All articles submitted to the Lahore Journal of Business should be evaluated for merit and quality, regardless of the author(s) ‘s gender, race, orientation, ethnic origin, religious beliefs, political philosophy, or citizenship.
- Editors are also responsible for maintaining the confidentiality of all submitted manuscripts and for protecting the anonymity of both authors and reviewers. Disclosure is strictly limited to members of the editorial team and other individuals directly involved in the peer review and publication process.
- Editors are responsible for sourcing anonymous peer reviews from respected experts to form the basis of their decision making. They are responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. Such choices must always be based on the validity of the work in question and its significance to readers and scholars.
- The final decision to accept or reject an article for publication, to be supported by the reviewers’ reports, remains with the editors.
- As a corollary to the above, should editors choose to go against the reviewers’ recommendations, they must be able to provide a clear and reasonable justification for doing so?
- Any information on a submitted article can only be shared by the editors with the corresponding author, reviewers, editorial board, and publisher, as applicable.
- Any of the work of the author(s), published or unpublished, and including data, cannot be used by editors or anyone involved with the journal or the publisher without the express written approval and consent of the author(s).
- Any ideas, information, or knowledge obtained from the review process should be kept confidential and cannot be used by the editors or staff for personal or professional benefit.
- During the publication process, the integrity and intellectual and ethical standards of the journal should not be compromised at any point. The editors are at all times willing and able to publish clarifications, corrections, apologies, retractions and negations as needed. They will do so in compliance with the COPE Guidelines for Retracting Articles.
Responsibilities of the Authors
- The authors should provide clear, up-to-date contact information, along with a precise description of their current employment and academic positions.
- Any connection to LJB editors or other staff, or to the Lahore School of Economics, must be made clear and transparent by the authors.
- Manuscripts submitted to the LJB must be completely original and have not been published in any primary publications prior to the LJB. If the same manuscript or article has been published elsewhere, it will be considered unethical and will be rejected or retracted by the journal’s editorial board.
- The manuscript should include sufficient details of sources and references so that others can replicate the paper’s findings. Any fraudulent or inaccurate statements, as well as misrepresentations of data and/or facts, constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable.
- The authors must disclose any sources of funding for the work reported in their manuscript: to be mentioned within the text and to the editors at the time of submission.
Responsibilities of Reviewers
- The editors should be promptly notified if the selected reviewer is unable or unqualified to review the research stated in the article, manuscript or paper.
- During the review process, strict confidentiality should be maintained at all times. The unpublished work, including the data and associated information, may be used only by the reviewer during the review process and may not be shared with others.
- The reviewers must remain objective and review the manuscripts on their merits, with their comments reflecting as such. The LJB will not accept ad hominem remarks and other forms of personal criticism by reviewers.
- The reviewer should identify the relevant published work that has not been cited in the submitted research. In the reviews, any observations, derivations, or arguments made by the reviewer that have been previously stated must be accompanied by the related citations.
- The reviewer must also point out any significant overlap and/or similarity between the manuscript that is being reviewed and any other previously published research to the editor and the author(s).
- The reviewers ought not to consider manuscripts for which they have competing, cooperative, or other relationships or affiliations with any of the authors, businesses, or organisations associated with the manuscripts that could give rise to a conflict of interest.