Fostering Environmental Performance through Green Supply Chain Practices: Empirical Evidence from Manufacturing Firms in Pakistan
- Umme Rubab
- umrubab97@gmail.com
- Visiting Faculty Bahria University Karachi, Pakistan
- Muhammad Rahies Khan
- mrashies581@gmail.com
- Ph.D. Scholar Department of Management Sciences Bahria University Karachi, Pakistan
- (Corresponding Author)
- Muhammad Mutasim Billah Tufail
- mutasimtufail.bukc@bahria.edu.pk
- Associate Professor Department of Management Sciences Bahria University Karachi, Pakistan
Submitted
November 22, 2023
Accepted
November 22, 2023
Accepted
November 22, 2023
- Received
- 9 September 2023
- Revised
- 25 February 2024
- Accepted
- 18 April 2024
Abstract
Achieving sustainable performance is a challenging but useful tool for firms in this competitive environment. The literature highlights several avenues to address sustainable performance, but there is a lack of emphasis on common practices and strategies. This study examines the role of green initiatives, specifically eco-design, green purchasing and reverse logistics, in addressing environmental performance. Practice-based view theory is used to evaluate the influence of these common green practices on a firm’s environmental performance. A total of 214 participants were approached to participate in this study and data analysis was conducted using AMOS. The findings reveal a significant and positive impact of ecodesign, green purchasing and reverse logistics on environmental performance. This study provides implications for practitioners, policymakers and academics regarding environmentally oriented business operations that could better serve manufacturing firms. Additionally, firms are encouraged to focus on easily imitable, easy-to transfer and easy-to understand practices to address sustainable performance.
Keywords
GSCM
environmental performance
eco-design
reverse logistics
green purchasing
supply chain management
This work is licensed under LJB.
- Citation
Rubab, U., Khan, M. R., & Tufail, M. M. B. (2024). Fostering Environmental Performance through Green Supply Chain Practices: Empirical Evidence from Manufacturing
Firms in Pakistan. The Lahore Journal of Business, 11(2), 89-114.
https://doi.org/10.35536/ljb.2024.v11.i2.a4
- References
- Abdullah, R., Mohamad, M. N., & Thurasamy, R. (2019). Towards sustainable performance: Promoting eco-design in green supply chain management practices. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 8(3), 609–616.
- Adriana, B. (2009). Environmental supply chain management in tourism: The case of large tour operators. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17(16), 1385–1392.
- Ahmad, A., Ikram, A., Rehan, M. F., & Ahmad, A. (2022). Going green: Impact of green supply chain management practices on sustainability performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 973676.
- Azapagic, A. (2003). Systems approach to corporate sustainability. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 81(5), 303–316.
- Azevedo, S. G., Carvalho, H., & Cruz Machado, V. (2011). The influence of green practices on supply chain performance: A case study approach. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 47(6), 850–871.
- Bai, C., & Sarkis, J. (2010). Integrating sustainability into supplier selection with grey system and rough set methodologies. International Journal of Production Economics, 124(1), 252–264.
- Bloom, N., Dorgan, S., Dowdy, J., & Van Reenen, J. (2007). Management practice and productivity: Why they matter. Management Matters, 10.
- Bloom, N., Eifert, B., Mahajan, A., McKenzie, D., & Roberts, J. (2013). Does management matter? Evidence from India. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 128(1), 1–51.
- Bowen, F. E., Cousins, P. D., Lamming, R. C., & Farukt, A. C. (2001). The role of supply management capabilities in green supply. Production and Operations Management, 10(2), 174–189.
- Büyüközkan, G., & Çifçi, G. (2012). A novel hybrid MCDM approach based on fuzzy DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS to evaluate green suppliers. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(3), 3000–3011.
- Christmann, P. (2000). Effects of ‘best practices’ of environmental management on cost advantage: The role of complementary assets. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 663–680.
- Dangelico, R. M., Pujari, D., & Pontrandolfo, P. (2017). Green product innovation in manufacturing firms: A sustainability-oriented dynamic capability perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(4), 490–506.
- Del Brío, J. Á., Fernandez, E., & Junquera, B. (2007). Management and employee involvement in achieving an environmental action-based competitive advantage: an empirical study. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18(4), 491–522.
- Dowlatshahi, S. (2000). Designer–buyer–supplier interface: Theory versus practice. International Journal of Production Economics, 63(2), 111–130.
- Dzikriansyah, M. A., Masudin, I., Dzulfikarijah, F., Jihadi, M., & Jatmiko, R. D. (2023). The role of green supply chain management practices on environmental performance: A case of Indonesian small and medium enterprises. Cleaner Logistics and Supply Chain, 6, 100100.
- Ellis, D. (2006). Streamlining reverse logistics. Multichannel Merchant.
- Eltayeb, T. K., Zailani, S., & Ramayah, T. (2011). Green supply chain initiatives among certified companies in Malaysia and environmental sustainability: Investigating the outcomes. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 55(5), 495–506.
- Fu, L., Yang, D., Liu, S., & Mei, Q. (2023). The impact of green supply chain management on enterprise environmental performance: A meta-analysis. Chinese Management Studies, 17(2), 274–289.
- Geng, R., Mansouri, S. A., & Aktas, E. (2017). The relationship between green supply chain management and performance: A meta-analysis of empirical evidence in Asian emerging economies. International Journal of Production Economics, 183(PA), 245–258.
- Georgiadis, P., & Vlachos, D. (2004). Decision making in reverse logistics using system dynamics. Yugoslav Journal of Operations Research, 14(2), 259–272.